- This topic has 16 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 5 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
“I don’t know in what direction this thread is actually going, because I only wanted to know what has actually happened to Yudelove. There seem to be some kind of conspiracy behind it. ”
Hello. Sometimes thinking he got mad. Sometimes thinking he want hemself not to be a public person. I guess we will never know if he not speak for hemself. But what I have heard he was told to leave this forum. There will be alot of myths about this guy if he not is able to speak for hemself. I not realy believe in any conspiracy but what newspaper write is not always a good source of information. The story is of course biased/slanted. I myself was into this question awhile ago but as long as not any adequate real new information is arriving there is realy not much else to speak about than specualtions, so I of the topic for now.
“In the acknowledgements there is also reference to Michael Winn himself so he must have also originally supported the basic idea of the book. ”
In my opinion the practise in Yudeloves book is wery close to Mantak Chias own practises. People write about Yudeloves practise as an own system. I´m skeptical to such an description. It´s like Mantak Chias system but with some not fundamental changes. The same is true with Winn´s practise. They all are wery close. But Mantak Chia I belive had told in the forword to some of the Yudelovess book that he had found an own system. Some changes might there be but are they so greate that it is rigth to speak about a own system. For me it´s only variations. I think also the label put on Yudelove as a master in hes own right, by Chia, migth be involved in this. I think chia thinks that if you are a master you are able to go your own way with your practise and take it to higher or different realms than your own master. In this sence I gueass also Winn is a master. But as only at intruductory level in this practise myself I might not have the right to speak about the much more evolved people in this system.
“Other book which in my mind gives very good overview (in English) is of course LU KUAN YU/CHAO PI CH’EN book “Taoist Yoga: Alchemy & Immortality.”
Yes this book is a realy good one, but I have some dificulty reading things on a much higher level than my own practise. Want myself to be at the same level or close to the things I read about. Have changed with my practise. Before practising this I was more into reading about nearly anything today I want to have practical experience myself also.
“I think that for a moment I still keep to myself what kind of efforts I have really made myself towards the practices. I don’t have so much time to be online and I am still so new on this forum.”
Well thats cool. It realy is up to you what you want to respond to and what not on any forum!
“The Russian guy was somebody else. ” Ok
S D
About Star in the Circle!
This is somehow very complicated subject.
Because it would actually require longer study in itself I would like to point out first of all some sources which one could use to approach this kind of intricate topic. It’s clear that this kind of forum is not really maybe even right media.
If one wants to see “Star in the Circle” in more elaborate for one could take look at the Emblem of the Theosophical Society.
One could also take some material from Mexico which is quite scattered, but there is one relatively recent study which should not be too much New Age in negative sense. I mean John Major Jenkins’ “Maya Cosmogenesis 2012.” In this book there’s two captains of Chichen Itza: Captains Serpent & Sundisk.
But best of all there is “Imperial Guide to Feng Shui & Chinese Astrology” translated by Thomas F. Aylward.
I’m myself preparing to have some nice retreat in the summer to practice in the Finnish forest some Daoist Yoga and also some Tom Brown,Jr. stuff, so I have to again stop.
MK
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.