9-11 Questions Already Rising in Red Dog Year

Ah, I see the day after I made my Red Fire Dog prediction that a newswite crosses my desk on the very topic of 9-11.

BTW, I forgot to include in my prediction possible increased volcanic activity. Yang Fire penetrates Dog earth, attracts a fiery response.

michael

EXPERTS CLAIM OFFICIAL 9/11 STORY IS A HOAX
PRWeb
January 30, 2006

http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2006/1/emw339303.htm

Duluth, MN – A group of distinguished experts and scholars, including Robert
M. Bowman, James H. Fetzer, Wayne Madsen, John McMurtry, Morgan Reynolds,
and Andreas von Buelow, have concluded that senior government officials have
covered up crucial facts about what really happened on 9/11.

They have joined with others in common cause as members of “Scholars for
9/11 Truth” (S9/11T) <http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/>, because they are
convinced, based on their own research, that the administration has been
deceiving the nation about critical events in New York and Washington, D.C.

These experts suggest these events may have been orchestrated by elements
within the administration to manipulate Americans into supporting policies
at home and abroad they would never have condoned absent “another Pearl
Harbor.”

They believe that this White House is incapable of investigating itself and
hope the possibility that Congress might hold an unaccountable
administration accountable is not merely naive or wishful thinking.

They are encouraging news services around the world to secure scientific
advice by taking advantage of university resources to verify or to falsify
their discoveries. Extraordinary situations, they believe, require
extraordinary measures.

If this were done, they contend, one of the great hoaxes of history would
stand naked before the eyes of the world and its perpetrators would be
clearly exposed, which may be the only hope for saving this nation from ever
greater abuse.

They hope this might include The New York Times, which, in their opinion,
has repeatedly failed to exercise the leadership expecedt from our nation’s
newspaper of record by a series of inexplicable lapses. It has failed to
vigorously investigate tainted elections, lies leading to the war in Iraq,
or illegal NSA spying on the American people, major unconstitutional events.
In their view, The Times might compensate for its loss of stature by helping
to reveal the truth about one of the great turning-point events of modern
history.

Stunning as it may be to acknowledge, they observe, the government has
brought but one indictment against anyone and, to the best of their
knowledge, has not even reprimanded anyone for incompetence or dereliction
of duty. The official conspiracy theory–that nineteen Arab hijackers under
control of one man in the wilds of Afghanistan brought this about–is
unsupportable by the evidential data, which they have studied. They even
believe there are good reasons for suspecting that video tapes officially
attributed to Osama bin Laden are not genuine.

They have found the government’s own investigiation to be severely flawed.
The 9/11 Commission, designated to investigate the attack, was directed by
Philip Zelikow, part of the Bush transition team in the NSA sector and the
co-author of a book with Condoleezza Rice. A Bush supporter and director of
national security affairs, he could hardly be expected to conduct an
objective and impartial investigation.

They have discovered that The 9/11 Commission Report is replete with
omissions, distortions, and factual errors, which David Ray Griffin has
documented in his book, The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and
Distortions. The official report, for example, entirely ignores the collapse
of WTC7, a 47-story building, which was hit by no airplanes, was only
damaged by a few small fires, and fell seven hours after the attack.

Here are some of the kinds of considerations that these experts and scholar
find profoundly troubling:

* In the history of structural engineering, steel-frame high-rise buildings
have never been brought down due to fires either before or since 9/11, so
how can fires have brought down three in one day? How is this possible?

* The BBC has reported that at least five of the nineteen alleged
“hijackers” have turned up alive and well living in Saudi Arabia, yet
according to the FBI, they were among those killed in the attacks. How is
this possible?

* Frank DeMartini, a project manager for the WTC, said the buildings were
designed with load redistribution capabilities to withstand the impact of
airliners, whose effects would be like “puncturing mosquito netting with a
pencil.” Yet they completely collapsed. How is this possible?

* Since the melting point of steel is about 2,700*F, the temperature of jet
fuel fires does not exceed 1,800*F under optimal conditions, and UL
certified the steel used to 2,000*F for six hours, the buildings cannot have
collapsed due to heat from the fires. How is this possible?

* Flight 77, which allegedly hit the building, left the radar screen in the
vicinity of the Ohio/Kentucky border, only to “reappear” in very close
proximity to the Pentagon shortly before impact. How is this possible?

* Foreign “terrorists” who were clever enough to coordinate hijacking four
commercial airliners seemingly did not know that the least damage to the
Pentagon would be done by hitting its west wing. How is this possible?

* Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, in an underground bunker at the
White House, watched Vice President Cheney castigate a young officer for
asking, as the plane drew closer and closer to the Pentagon, “Do the orders
still stand?” The order cannot have been to shoot it down, but must have
been the opposite. How is this possible?

* A former Inspector General for the Air Force has observed that Flight 93,
which allegedly crashed in Pennsylvania, should have left debris scattered
over an area less than the size of a city block; but it is scattered over an
area of about eight square miles. How is this possible?

* A tape recording of interviews with air traffic controllers on duty on
9/11 was deliberately crushed, cut into very small pieces, and distributed
in assorted places to insure its total destruction. How is this possible?

* The Pentagon conducted a training exercise called “MASCAL” simulating the
crash of a Boeing 757 into the building on 24 October 2000, and yet
Condoleezza Rice, among others, has repeatedly asserted that “no one ever
imagined” a domestic airplane could be used as a weapon. How is this
possible?

Their own physics research has established that only controlled demolitions
are consistent with the near-gravity speed of fall and virtually symmetrical
collapse of all three of the WTC buildings. While turning concrete into very
fine dust, they fell straight-down into their own footprints.

These experts and scholars have found themselves obliged to conclude that
the 9/11 atrocity represents an instance of the approach–which has been
identified by Karl Rove, the President’s closest adviser–of “creating our
own reality.”

————

RELATED LINK:

9/11 INFORMATION CENTER:
http://www.wanttoknow.info/911information
http://www.healingdao.com/healinglove.html